President Uhuru Kenyatta's speech delivered in Addis Ababa at the Extra Ordinary Session of the Assemblies of Heads of State and Government of the African Union was a Kantian moment in two instances. First, in terms of his presidency the president came out guns blazing against the West and their ideals of justice. Second, in terms of African Union politics the president has started a discourse that is certainly going to continue in terms of AU engagement with powers outside the continent.
In his speech the president was as blunt as they come and gave a stinging attack to Western Nations.
Some of the snippets from this speech below shows the president has had a change of heart albeit now that he is in power and as such the gloves are now finally off.
First, that world powers were hesitant to a process that
might make them accountable for such spectacularly criminal international
adventures as the wars in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan and other
places, and such hideous enterprises as renditions and torture. Such states
did not, therefore, consider such warnings as applicable to pacific and
friendly parties.
Secondly, it was the understanding of good-faith
subscribers that the ICC would administer and secure justice in a
fair, impartial and independent manner and, as an international court,
bring accountability to situations and perpetrators everywhere in the world. As well,
it was hoped that the ICC would set the highest standards of justice and
judicial processes.
This speech represents a defining moment in Uhuru Kenyatta's presidency and as such we could start percing events in Kenya in context of the pre AU convention speech and post AU convention speech. What remain is to see if he will appear at the ICC on November 12, 2013 or he will follow the AU resolution that asked him not to show up at the Hague.
Three weeks ago the vice president of Kenya William Ruto
undertook his first diplomatic tour since ascending office. I am aware of his
tour of Netherlands but that does NOT count since he was going there to
participate in the ICC conference involving his case where he is charged
together with radio journalist Sang.
Most of the reporting of the West African diplomatic
onslaught has been around what is currently referred to as the Jet Scandal. This
involves the manner in which the office of the Vice President went about
procuring the services of a luxurious jet and the price the state will pay for
this trip. The Nation Media Group through its Nation newspaper publication was
first to break this story together with an invoice of what it cost to procure
the services of this luxurious jet. After this story there was a huge reaction
on the Kenya social media which goes by harsh tag #KOT [Kenyan’s on Twitter].
The office of the Vice President has tried to contain this ‘scandal’
by giving their side of story. As of now we know there has been no wrong doing
by the office of VP in terms of procurement. What has annoyed the public is the
huge sums of money involved in this West African trip while the government has
been busy advocating for austerity in spending of public funds. In fact the
president [Uhuru Kenyatta] has been walking the talk. Recently he attended the
London Somalia conference on board a Kenya Airways commercial flight.
the President arriving at JKIA from his working trip of London I PPS
Why did the Vice
President undertake a tour to West Africa?
While the official narrative being spawn around is that the
West African circuit undertaken by the VP was to push for more trade
engagements with our West African counterparts. Well, this is a welcomed move
by UhuRuto administration.
However, I cannot buy this narrative. I tend to think that
this trip might have had more than meets the eye. My hypothesis is that the vice
president undertook this trip in the lead to the African Union Summit
celebrating 50 years. His brief might have been to seek support for the Ugandan
draft which seeks to push for the African ICC cases to be brought back to the
continent. If you look at his itinerary and the timing of this visit one can
read the motives.
Perhaps one of the disturbing assessments I seem to be
drawing out of this trip is the fact that the ICC prosecutor comes from a West
African country. The question that needs to asked is could there be an
underground movement to push her office to drop the cases facing our leaders?
The Changing Tide in Perceptions about ICC
Since the president and vice president ascended to power
there has been a movement which has risen to push for their agenda. This movement
has castigated the International Criminal Court. This onslaught started with painting
a bad picture of the Kenyan civil society. This has been done by a blanket
condemnation of civil society by account of its funding mechanism. Since most
of the civil society receives funding from international donors then it has
been assumed there is a positive correlation between funding and advocating for
interests of the West. In this case the pursuit of the perpetrators of Post Election
Violence is viewed as a western endeavor. It should be noted that civil society
played a big role in collecting evidence on the 2007/08 post election violence.
While I might certainly NOT agree with all the civil society does personal
attacks towards CSO leaders is certainly not the way to go.
CSO attacks by people close to the president
The election of Jubilee government to power has been assumed
to be a referendum against the ICC since the president and the vice president
have cases currently ongoing. The questions perhaps occupying most of us is;
· + Are the two leaders the ONLY ones responsible
for what befell the country in 2007?
· + Will the victims achieve justice from a process
taking place in Europe?
While most of the population seems to agree that the
president and the Vice president are not the only ones who we’re responsible
for the 2007/08. A discourse of the two politicians being made the sacrificial
lambs is currently being advocated.
It remains to be seen what is going to happen in the coming
days since it appears their cases might be collapsing at the ICC on account of
witnesses pulling out and as a result of lobbying in high places by Uhuru
administration.